CleanTechnica•about 1 month ago
Hawaii’s LNG Detour: Why A Fossil Bridge Arriving In The 2030s Makes No Sense
Key Takeaway
Hawaii's consideration of LNG as a bridge fuel for the 2030s is presented as an illogical detour given the accelerating progress and economic viability of renewable energy alternatives.
AI Summary
- •Hawaii is re-evaluating its electricity system, with LNG proposed as a bridge fuel to replace its current heavy reliance on oil for power generation, particularly on Oahu.
- •The article strongly argues against the viability of new LNG infrastructure arriving in the 2030s, citing the rapid advancements and cost-effectiveness of renewable energy solutions.
- •This debate signals significant policy uncertainty but also a strong push towards decarbonization, potentially creating substantial opportunities for renewable energy (solar, wind, storage) developers and influencing long-term energy costs for large consumers.
Topics
ccgtemissionspolicysimple-cyclesolarstoragewind
Article Content
Hawaii is re-evaluating its electricity system again and LNG is back on the table as a proposed bridge between oil dependence and a renewable future. The idea is simple at first glance. Hawaii burns more oil for electricity than any other state and Oahu still relies on oil for most ... [continued] The post Hawaii’s LNG Detour: Why A Fossil Bridge Arriving In The 2030s Makes No Sense appeared first on CleanTechnica .